Cermeg

SELECTION FROM E-JOURNALS JANUARY-MARCH 2010

(by Letizia Mingardo)

 

 1. JUDICIAL ARGUMENTATION AND LEGAL LOGIC

2. BIOETHICS AND ETHICS

3. CRIMINAL JUSTICE

4. LAW AND I.T.

5. MISCELLANEOUS

 

1. JUDICIAL ARGUMENTATION AND LEGAL LOGIC

 

Argumentation (2010) 24:19-40

A System of Argumentation Forms in Aristotle

Simon Wolf

http://www.springerlink.com/content/95047283h3023267/fulltext.pdf

(subscription only)

 

Argumentation (2010) 24:41-69

Pragma-Dialectics and the Function of Argumentation

Christoph Lumer

http://www.springerlink.com/content/m318851473092k5n/fulltext.pdf

(subscription only)

 

Argumentation (2010) 24:85-105

Second Order Intersubjectivity: The Dialectical Dimension of Argumentation

Lilian Bermejo-Luque

http://www.springerlink.com/content/c162v8l5k2304v74/fulltext.pdf

(subscription only)

 

Argumentation (2010) 24:125-133

Formal Logic vs. Philosophical Argument Within the Stoic Tradition

Dragan Stoianovici

http://www.springerlink.com/content/9433071306571625/fulltext.pdf

(subscription only)

 

Argumentation (2010) 24:181-196

Representation of Argumentation in Text with Rhetorical Structure Theory

Nancy L. Green

http://www.springerlink.com/content/gh2050432831v082/fulltext.pdf

(subscription only)

 

Argumentation (2010) 24:197-210

What is the Reason for This Rule? An Inferential Account of the Ratio Legis

Damiano Canale. Giovanni Tuzet

http://www.springerlink.com/content/jv7626v05852k07g/fulltext.pdf

(subscription only)

 

Argumentation (2010) 24:211-226

Arguing About Goals: The Diminishing Scope of Legal Reasoning

Pauline Westerman

http://www.springerlink.com/content/x049166543847421/fulltext.pdf

(open access)

 

Informal Logic, Vo1. 30, No.1 (2010), pp. 1-33

The Value of Genetic Fallacies

Andrew C. Ward

http://ojs.uwindsor.ca/ojs/leddy/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/1237/2365

(subscription only)

 

Informal Logic, Vol. 30, No. 1 (2010), pp. 62-91

Analyzing Social Policy Argumentation: A case study on the opinion of the German National Ethics Council on an amendment of the Stem Cell Law

Frank Zenker

http://ojs.uwindsor.ca/ojs/leddy/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/2947/2367

(subscription only)

 

Informal Logic, Vol. 30, No. 1 (2010), pp. 34-61

Defeasible Classifications and Inferences from Definitions

Douglas Walton

http://ojs.uwindsor.ca/ojs/leddy/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/692/2366

(subscription only)

 

International Journal for the Semiotics of Law (2009) 22:387-398

Does Legal Semiotics Cannibalize Jurisprudence?

Jose´ de Sousa e Brito

http://www.springerlink.com/content/k0765rvl725×1854/fulltext.pdf

(subscription only)

 

International Journal for the Semiotics of Law (2009) 22:399-410

What There is Left and How It Works: Ancient Rhetoric and the Semiotics of Law

Miklós Könczöl

http://www.springerlink.com/content/e4m0j71q73862727/fulltext.pdf

(subscription only)

 

Law and Philosophy (2010) 29:159-187

Do judges have an obligation to enforce the law?: Moral responsibility and judicial reasoning

Anthony Reeves

http://www.springerlink.com/content/p428181j67k22824/fulltext.pdf

(subscription only)

 

Legal Studies, Vol. 30 No. 1, March 2010, pp. 74-97

Getting to (not) guilty: examining jurors’ deliberative processes in, and beyond, the context of a mock rape triallest

Louise Ellison and Vanessa E Munro

http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/fulltext/123233789/PDFSTART

(subscription only)

 

Ratio Juris. Vol. 23 No. 1 March 2010 (65-100)

Understanding Blended Multi-Source Arguments as Arguments from Partial Analogies

Marcello Guarini

http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/fulltext/123282582/PDFSTART

(subscription only)

 

 

2. BIOETHICS AND ETHICS

 

Bioethics Volume 24 Number 3 2010 pp 105-112

End-of-life care in the 21st century: advance directives in universal rights discourse

Violeta Beširević

http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/fulltext/123269139/PDFSTART

(subscription only)

 

Bioethics Volume 24 Number 3 2010 pp 145-15

‘Vague Oviedo’: autonomy, culture and the case of previously competent patients

Assya Pascalev, Takis Vidalis

http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/fulltext/123269136/PDFSTART

(subscription only)

 

Ethical Theory and Moral Practice (2010) 13:3-18

In Defence of Bad Science and Irrational Policies: an Alternative Account of the Precautionary Principle

Stephen John

http://www.springerlink.com/content/r6663452vln717jq/fulltext.pdf

(subscription only)

 

Genomics, Society and Policy 2009, Vol.5, No.2 pp.40-52

The impact of new life sciences innovation on political theories of justice

Theo Papaioannou

http://www.gspjournal.com/

(open access)

 

The Journal of Ethics (2010) 14:1-16

Is Moral Motivation Rationally Required?

Alan H. Goldman

http://www.springerlink.com/content/5722t8w685741376/fulltext.pdf

(subscription only)

 

Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics (2010) 31:93-105

Madness versus badness: the ethical tension between the recovery movement and forensic psychiatry

Claire L. Pouncey, Jonathan M. Lukens

http://www.springerlink.com/content/9201738307511p46/fulltext.pdf

(subscription only)

 

Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics (2010) 31:49-62

Addiction and self-determination: A phenomenological approach

Jann E. Schlimme

http://www.springerlink.com/content/y8773p527q366152/fulltext.pdf

(subscription only)

 

 

3. CRIMINAL JUSTICE

 

The British Journal of Criminology, Volume 50, Issue 2, March 2010

(tratto da: The British Journal of Criminology (2002) 42, 563-577)

Setting standards for Restorative Justice

John Braithwaite

http://bjc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/reprint/42/3/563

(open access)

 

Criminal Law and Philosophy (2010) 4:77-98

On the Relevance of Neuroscience to Criminal Responsibility

Nicole A Vincent

http://www.springerlink.com/content/2g44765m11v6554h/fulltext.pdf

(open access)

 

Criminal Law Forum (2009) 20:395-416

Where do they belong? Giving victims a place in the criminal justice process

Jo-Anne Wemmers

http://www.springerlink.com/content/32n16w21565v4j32/fulltext.pdf

(subscription only)

 

 

4. LAW AND I.T.

 

Artificial Intelligence and Law (2009) 17:253-290

Cognitive automata and the law: electronic contracting and the intentionality of software agents

Giovanni Sartor

http://www.springerlink.com/content/0j80964v227746q2/fulltext.pdf

(subscription only)

 

Artificial Intelligence and Law (2009) 17:321-370

Teaching a process model of legal argument with hypotheticals

Kevin D. Ashley

http://www.springerlink.com/content/j13×038v46t2270t/fulltext.pdf

(subscription only)

 

Ethics and Information Technologies (2010) 12:3-15

Self-exposure and exposure of the self: informational privacy and the presentation of identity

David W. Shoemaker

http://www.springerlink.com/content/4652l38367×4k366/fulltext.pdf

(subscription only)

 

Ethics and Information Technologies (2010) 12:43-55

Practical versus moral identities in identity management

Noëmi Manders-Huits

http://www.springerlink.com/content/c667mq1601372467/fulltext.pdf

(subscription only)

 

 

5. MISCELLANEOUS

 

Law and Critique (2010) 21:17-37

Madness and the Law: The Derrida/Foucault Debate Revisited

Jacques de Ville

http://www.springerlink.com/content/hp40xw831800g753/fulltext.pdf

(subscription only)

 

Law and Critique (2010) 21:39-51

Politics of Law and the Lacanian Real

Amy Swiffen

http://www.springerlink.com/content/829274v6r1604728/fulltext.pdf

(subscription only)

 

Law and Philosophy (2010) 29:31-74

Why evolutionary biology is (so far) irrelevant to legal regulation

Brian Leiter and Michael Weisberg

http://www.springerlink.com/content/9346hq6788710×50/fulltext.pdf

(subscription only)

This entry was posted on Friday April 2 2010 at 4:50 pm and is filed under Reviews. You can follow any update to this entry through the RSS 2.0. Both comments and pings are currently closed.